News

Austenitic stainless steel is widely used in multiple fields such as industrial manufacturing, construction, food processing, medical devices, and chemical equipment, thanks to its excellent corrosion resistance, good formability, and weldability. Among them, 304 and 304L are the two most common grades. Although they are similar in appearance and overlapping in applications, there are critical differences in composition, performance, and applicable scenarios. A correct understanding of these differences is crucial for engineering material selection, cost control, and long-term safe operation. This article will conduct an in-depth analysis of the differences between 304 and 304L stainless steel from the aspects of chemical composition, mechanical properties, welding characteristics, corrosion resistance, and typical application scenarios, and provide practical selection suggestions. I. Basic Definitions and Differences in Chemical Composition 304 stainless steel (UNS S30400) is a standard 18-8 austenitic stainless steel, containing approximately 18% chromium (Cr) and 8% nickel (Ni), with excellent comprehensive performance. 304L (UNS S30403), on the other hand, is the “low-carbon” version of 304, where the “L” stands for Low Carbon. The core difference between the two lies in carbon content: – 304 stainless steel: Maximum carbon content is 0.08% – 304L stainless steel: Maximum carbon content is limited to 0.03% This seemingly minor difference, however, exerts a profound influence on the material’s behavior during welding or in high-temperature environments. II. Why Control Carbon Content? — Intergranular Corrosion Issue In stainless steel, chromium is a key element for forming a passive film and providing corrosion resistance. Nevertheless, when stainless steel with a relatively high carbon content (such as 304) is heated to the temperature range of 425–815°C (e.g., the heat-affected zone during welding), carbon will combine with chromium to form chromium carbide (Cr₂₃C₆). This process consumes a large amount of chromium near the grain boundaries, resulting in local chromium content falling below the critical value of 12% required to maintain passivation, thereby forming a chromium-depleted zone at the grain boundaries. This phenomenon is called sensitization, which is prone to causing intergranular corrosion — corrosion propagates rapidly along the grain boundaries. Even if the surface appears intact, the internal structure has been severely degraded, which may eventually lead to equipment failure or even safety accidents. By reducing the carbon content to below 0.03%, 304L greatly minimizes the potential for chromium carbide formation, thereby significantly enhancing intergranular corrosion resistance. It is particularly suitable for occasions where solution heat treatment cannot be performed after welding. III. Comparison of Mechanical Properties Since carbon is a strengthening element, reducing carbon content usually leads to a slight decrease in strength: Performance Indicators Tensile Strength (MPa) Yield Strength (MPa) Elongation (%) 304 Stainless Steel ≥515 ≥205 ≥40 304L Stainless Steel ≥485 ≥170 ≥40 It can be seen that the strength of 304L is slightly lower than that of 304, but their elongation is comparable, and 304L still has good ductility and formability. In most non-high-load structural applications, this strength difference is negligible. However, in occasions with high strength requirements (such as high-pressure vessels and high-strength fasteners), 304 may be a better choice. IV. Welding Performance and Heat Treatment The greatest advantage of 304L lies in its excellent welding performance. Due to its low-carbon design, sensitization hardly occurs during welding. Therefore: – No post-weld heat treatment (such as solution annealing) is required – Suitable for thick-plate or multi-pass welding structures – Applicable to on-site installation, large-scale piping systems, and other scenarios where subsequent heat treatment is difficult to perform In contrast, if 304 is in the sensitization temperature range after welding, solution heat treatment (heating to 1040–1150°C followed by rapid cooling) is required to re-dissolve chromium carbide and restore corrosion resistance. However, this is often impractical for large-scale components or on-site construction. Therefore, in projects involving a large amount of welding, engineers usually prefer 304L to avoid risks. V. Comparison of Corrosion Resistance In general atmospheric, fresh water, and weak acid-base environments, the corrosion resistance of 304 and 304L is almost the same. However, 304L performs better in the following situations: – Welded joint areas: 304L is not prone to intergranular corrosion – Service environments with long-term exposure to 400–800°C: such as heat exchangers and exhaust systems – Occasions in contact with chloride-containing media and with welding residual stress It should be noted that 304L is not a “universal anti-corrosion material”. In strong acids (such as hydrochloric acid), high-concentration chlorides (such as seawater), or high-temperature oxidation environments, even 304L may experience pitting corrosion or stress corrosion cracking. In such cases, higher-grade materials (such as 316L and duplex steel) should be considered. VI. Comparison of Typical Application Scenarios Application Fields Recommended Material Reason Explanation Food processing equipment 304 or 304L Both meet FDA standards; if the equipment requires a large amount of welding, 304L is preferred Chemical storage tanks/pipelines 304L Large amount of welding, avoiding the risk of intergranular corrosion Architectural decoration (railings, curtain walls) 304 Little or no welding, slightly higher strength, and lower cost Medical devices 304L High cleanliness requirements, no heat treatment possible after welding Household kitchenware 304 Cost-sensitive, generally no welding sensitization issues VII. Selection Decision Guidelines In practical engineering, the following principles can be referred to for material selection: 1. Is welding involved? – If there is a large amount of welding and post-weld heat treatment cannot be performed → Choose 304L – If it is cold-formed or requires only a small amount of spot welding → 304 is sufficient 2. Is the service temperature within the sensitization range? – Long-term operating temperature > 425°C → Prioritize 304L 3. Are there special requirements for strength? – High-strength structural components → Consider 304 (or use 304H high-temperature grade) 4. Cost considerations – 304L is usually slightly more expensive than 304 (due to stricter smelting control). If not necessary, there is no need for excessive selection of 304L 5. Industry specification requirements – Certain standards (such as ASME BPE, FDA, GMP) explicitly recommend the use of low-carbon stainless steel → 304L must be used In summary, although both 304 and 304L belong to the classic austenitic stainless steel family, the “L” embodies the in-depth consideration of material science for engineering safety. Material selection should not only depend on price or habits, but also be based on a comprehensive judgment of specific working conditions, manufacturing processes, and long-term reliability. In scenarios with intensive welding, inability to perform heat treatment, or high-temperature service, the “low-carbon” advantage of 304L is irreplaceable; while in ordinary structural or decorative applications, 304 is more cost-effective. Wise material selection can balance performance, safety, and cost, laying a solid foundation for the project. #304stainlesssteel #304Lstainlesssteel #stainlesssteelfactory #chinafactory #stainlesssteelchinafactory